Thursday, September 14, 2017

Decoding Translational Research

Sarah Wawrzynski
PhD Student
College of Nursing
University of Utah


Historically, basic medical research focused on gaining knowledge of the world around us, such as understanding mechanisms of disease, or biologic response to disease. Research was performed to better understand the world around us, and was not necessarily aimed at gaining applicable knowledge for curing disease, defining best practice, and promoting health. This paradigm has shifted over the last half century and translational research has emerged. See a historical biography. Translational research is broadly defined as a multidisciplinary research that aims to bridge the gaps between basic medical research and its application at the bedside or in the community. Researchers and scientists in medical translational research now aim to improve patient outcomes and promote health within this new context.
The idea of translational science was first printed in 1974 in the New England Journal of Medicine,1 and in 2006, the NIH put out a statement about the importance of bridging the gaps between basic research and clinical practice.2   This promoted the development of specialists in translational science, as well as the development of journals dedicated to promoting this type of research.
The Journal of Translational Science, published an image outlining the gaps in research.3  The translational gaps identified have been used to describe the stage or type of translational science being done. Click for more info.
This has set the model for the “T” phases of translational health research:
      T1 Research linking basic scientific discoveries to human application.
T2 Research of clinical practice and safety.
T3 Research linking lab research to population research to provide more meaningful results.
T4 Evaluation of “real world” treatments. 

Only five years ago, the NIH established the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS). Their mission is to bring together multidisciplinary researchers that can link research to clinical practice and improve patient outcomes more efficiently than in the past.  Just this week they awarded a 12-million-dollar grant to researchers at Dartmouth who will be tackling lung cancer and precision medicine in a multifaceted approach. Their study will include identifying genes that are linked to lung cancer and validating current biomarkers for lung cancer for screening in patients. Finally, they will work to integrate this data with patient environmental exposure and population risk assessments to better screen and identify those at risk of lung cancer.
        
             While the concept of translational research has evolved, it has become an integral part of discovery in relation to patient centered outcome and public health research.  For the interested reader, Translational Research publishes many translational studies. One such study about circulating tumor cells (CTC’s), helps to bridge the gap between bench research done identifying ways to screen for CTC’s and clinical care by reviewing the types of CTC detection screenings tested. Further, they review the advantages and disadvantages of each test as well as the clinical implications. While there is still work to be done in this field, this paper serves to provide a resource to providers with up to date information for treating patients with advanced cancers. Additional translational studies are discussed here on nature.com.
               Of course there are critics of translational research, The perils of translational research. These criticisms are mainly focused in two areas. First, that it detracts from basic research finds which provide the “raw” materials for translational science. This is an important consideration when looking at where research dollars are allocated each year.5  Secondly, critics point to a lack of reproducibility. This, however, could be said about many types of research, and requires the fastidiousness of every researcher.
            There are many opportunities for researchers interested in this type of research, including funding. Bill and Melinda Gates have outlined some of these on their foundation website. This is an exciting time to be in research, and many opportunities are available for specialized training in this area.
              
Useful links for further investigation and support:

NCATS program overview and initiatives:

 University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science

NIH Training Translational Research Training

References:
1.    Wolf, S. (1974). The real gap between bench and bedside. New England Journal of Medicine, 290(14), 802-803. doi:10.1056/NEJM197404042901411
2.    Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA, 299(2), 211-213. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2007.26
3.    Drolet, B. C., & Lorenzi, N. M. (2011). Translational research: Understanding the continuum from bench to bedside. Translational Research. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2010.10.002
4.    Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Mercier, S., Lewison, G., & Mogoutov, A. (2006). Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research. European Journal of Cancer. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.07.020
5.    Fang, C. F., & Casadevall, A. (2010). Lost in translation-basic science in the era of translational research. Journal of Infection and Immunity, 78(2), 563-566. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01318-09

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Shifting Our Focus from Sick-Care to Health-Care: Examining The Social Determinants of Healthcare, and Redefining the Meaning of Health

Rebecca Perkins - 2016 conTEXT for Advancing Science student
PhD Student
College of Nursing
University of Utah

The Current State of Health in the U.S.
The United States has historically been built upon a disease-care model rather than a health-promotion model, and while our healthcare system has made some remarkable advances in technology, genetics, and pharmacotherapy, we as a nation have failed to address some of the most fundamental healthcare needs that can promote physical, psychological, spiritual, and financial wellbeing; factors that are directly related to better health outcomes and quality of life for all Americans, both rich and poor. As a result, our country is now facing a major existential crisis of what it means to live a truly healthy, productive, and fulfilling life.

The current healthcare paradigm is a sick-care system, not a healthcare system. This is no surprise given the rise in health disparities and the dramatic shift from treating communicable diseases to caring for chronic illnesses such as heart disease, cancer, strokes, and diabetes which are responsible for almost 70% of morbidity and early deaths in the U.S. It is no wonder, given the current healthcare paradigm and current health status of Americans (especially those suffering from financial difficulty and multiple complex social and health-related issues) that the U.S. spends around 17.9% of the country’s GDP on health care, with 75% of this amount allocated to treating and managing chronic diseases. 


Figure 1. Pill bottle spilled. By M Pelletier, 2016, (Atlantic Training), via Wikimedia Commons. Used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
  
While the U.S. pays more for healthcare than any other country, it greatly lags behind in almost every measure of health grades. You may wonder how this is possible given the valuable strides Americans have made in science and medicine; however, the answer is relatively simple. First, one’s actual health status does not entirely depend on advancements in healthcare, and second, even when the state of our health becomes dependent upon innovative services that our system provides, many Americans are unable to access needed treatments, let alone basic care, or they may get help too late or experience poor quality health care.


What Has Been Wrong with Healthcare and Still Is: Health is a Sociopolitical Issue

One of the major health-related issues that many Americans face on a daily basis is a general lack of access to healthcare. The U.S. falls behind almost every other nation when it comes to basic access to care. With approximately 45 million U.S. citizens (not to mention the millions of immigrants and undocumented workers) suffering from being uninsured or underinsured, poor health outcomes are a real and impending risk.

Figure 2. Percentage of US adults 18-64 years old without health insurance in 2009. By CDC, 2012, via Wikimedia Commons. Used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

Another important social issue that directly threatens adequate health status for a large portion of Americans is directly caused by lifestyle factors. Lifestyle and health status, consequently, are intimately connected to social determinants of health, such as reduced healthcare access, ability to consume healthy food, clean air, and live in safe neighborhoods. Moreover, a disadvantaged lifestyle has been associated with poor health status due to lack employment opportunities and the skyrocketing cost of healthcare. These types of disparities leave many Americans vulnerable and with limited options for care. As well, the stress that accompanies poverty can greatly effect an individual’s ability to adopt a healthy lifestyle and mitigate health risk factors associated with a poor diet, lack of exercise, tobacco use, and excessive drinking—coping strategies for increased stress.

The current decline in the U.S. healthcare system is, to a large extent, the product of two basic aspects of the U.S. political economy. One of the major contributing factors to a weak U.S. healthcare system stems from disadvantaged Americans lacking a voice, “a seat at the table” in the healthcare, political arena. Consequently, this population’s issues are often overlooked and under-represented in healthcare policy and reform. Secondly, the U.S. government still plays a minor role in health policy for each of the states. Health-based organizations and agencies have been fragmented and weak in effecting change for population health. As well, health-based agencies and various network organizations have been criticized for being disconnected from the actual delivery of health services. These are only a few contributing factors cited for what is wrong about the U.S. healthcare system today.

 The willingness of healthcare providers and patients to tolerate large, health-based inequalities (such as gaps in income, wealth, education preparation, and housing) has many unforeseen future health consequences. Yet, until we are truly willing to transcend this old paradigm of a reactive, disease-focused, model to proactive, health-focused model, the average health-related quality of life will continue to suffer. 

Time for a Paradigm Shift from Sick-Care to Health-Care…For All        

So, what if our healthcare system actually kept us healthy? What if instead of mostly focusing on restoring health, the U.S. healthcare system did as much, or more, to prevent disease? These salient, provocative questions have recently been proposed in a 2012 TED Talks (https://www.ted.com/talks/rebecca_onie_what_if_our_healthcare_system_kept_us_healthy?language=en) by Rebecca Onie, CEO and co-founder of Health Leads, “a social enterprise that envisions a healthcare system that addresses all patients’ basic resource needs as a standard part of quality care” (https://healthleadsusa.org/). In this 2012 TED Talk, Rebecca challenges her audience to consider that the question is not what patients need to restore health, but what patients need to be healthy.

A Little Background…
Figure 3. Rebecca Onie Health Services Innovator, By Photo by Gail Oskin, 2009, (WireImage), via Wikimedia Commons. Used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

Rebecca became frustrated during her internship with Boston Legal Services when she had an “AHA moment” and realized that, over the course of 9-months of her work at this agency, the families she was trying to help to secure adequate housing and resolve unemployment issues actually had underlying, complex social, political, and health issues that needed to first be addressed. She realized that the help she was giving was “too far down stream” for her clients who showed up already in a state of real crisis.
This realization was further accentuated later during her 6-month internship in a pediatric unit at Boston Medical Center where she had the chance to see patients and parents in crisis every day. She began to question physicians in this center over the next 6-months, and asked them, what she considered then, a naïve but fundamental question: “If you had unlimited resources, what is the one thing you would give your patients?” Surprisingly, or not so surprisingly, many physicians told her that he real issue was that there’s no food at home. Children we see are living in impoverished conditions, and there are is nothing we can do. We have no connection to social services, and we have no time to address these real issues.

The Big Question?

“If we know what it takes to have a healthcare system instead of a sick-care system, why don’t we just do it?” (Onie, 2012).

Thus, Health Leads was conceived out of a need to support physicians and healthcare providers in connecting patients to real resources they needed to not only get healthy but to be healthy.

The Big Idea?

Rebecca realized that if Health Leads could support physicians in writing prescriptions for the real health needs of patients (prescriptions for food, heat, and other social services that have a real impact on the underlying causes of sickness and disease) that the current system could truly be transformed into healthcare for the disadvantaged—care that extended beyond treating the immediate physiological diseases presented in the four walls of the clinic. In fact, she found one way that healthcare could address the basic sociopolitical determinants of health and quality of life for disadvantaged populations.

Other Shifts…

The innovative work of social health entrepreneurs like Onie have revolutionized the way we think about and look at health care. However, previous alternative approaches to healthcare such as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) have been around since antiquity. Yet, given the current rise in health disparities and chronic diseases in the U.S., CAM therapies are gaining new attention, respect, and relevance. 

What Can CAM Do for this Shift?

Figure 4. Massage hand , 2010, By Lubyanka, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10940918, via Wikimedia Commons. Used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

Holistic and health promoting interventions and education are integral to CAM, and certified CAM practitioners (i.e., acupuncturists, chiropractors, and massage therapists) are well-equipped to work alongside traditional physicians in providing patient-centered care that includes spending more time with patients to solve complex social and health issues. Moreover, CAM practitioners see the value in advocating for lifestyle changes that are conducive to promoting improved health and quality of life for patients. CAM practitioners also may reach patient populations that traditional practitioners miss. This is due to the idea that uninsured patients of lower socioeconomic status may seek out CAM providers as a fee-for-service model. Some patients may also seek CAM providers due to ideological beliefs about the benefits of CAM therapies versus traditional interventions. So, including CAM providers as part of an interdisciplinary healthcare team has emerged as a new concept for promoting holistic health and wellness over just treating disease among the U.S. population.

Barriers to Shifting from a Sick-Care to Health-Care Model

A recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine (http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1206230#t=article) argued that health promotion and a focus on health-related quality of life have become a topic of much discussion in health policy circles as of late. However, implementation of this new paradigm in U.S. healthcare is not without barriers. Economic and logistical issues plague this change. For one, the current model of care is a task-based model that pays physicians in numbers of “sick visits” per hour. This system is prohibitive of increased time spent with patients and decreases the ability and likelihood that physicians will take the time it requires to educate patients, connect them to outside services, and generally promote nonpharmacological interventions for improving health and preventing disease. It all comes down to money and time. Another formidable obstacle to leap is our current reliance on expensive technological procedures that add cost to care but may do little to promote health and wellness.
Finally, as mentioned earlier, the current healthcare system continues to reduce access to quality care for disadvantaged Americans—perpetuating social and health disparities that reduce the chance for patients to obtain basic, primary health needs. Finally, as mentioned, lack of cohesive and direct government policies that advocate for health promotion at every level continue to present difficulties in transitioning into the new paradigm for health-based care. And finally, patient lifestyles and health behaviors diminish potential for true health promotion and disease prevention—which are perpetuated by sociopolitical disparities among many lower income patients.

Future Directions

Recent efforts toward healthcare reform has brought forth modest improvements thus far. However, future prevention and health promotion will necessitate more profound changes such as the integration of preventive interventions the management and delivery of healthcare. Change is possible but not without addressing identified barriers and providing practical solutions for integration of new innovations and outside therapeutic modalities into the traditional system. Moving forward will require that we as a nation address health needs and health disparities at multiple levels. This a complex issue that will require a multidisciplinary approach as well real health policy reform that addresses the healthcare needs of the disadvantage populations of our nation.

References

Sierpina, V. S., Sierpina, M., Loera, J. A., & Grumbles, L. (2005). Complementary and Integrative Approaches to Dementia. Southern Medical Journal, 98(6), 636-645
Schroeder, S.A. (2007). We can do better-improving the health of the American people. New England Journal of Medicine 357, 1221-1228. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa073350
Thompson & Nichter (2015). Is there a role for complementary and alternative medicine in preventive and promotive health? An anthropological assessment in the context of U.S. health reform. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 30(6), 80-99. DOI 10.1111/maq.12153

Links to Resources
Health Leads:
New England Journal of Medicine:
TED Ideas Worth Spreading:

Photo Credits
CDC. (Photographer). (2012). Percentage of US adults 18-64 years old without health insurance in 2009 [digital image]. Retrieved from Wikimedia Commons website: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Percentage_of_US_adults_18-64_years_old_without_health_insurance_in_2009.png

Lubyanka. (Photographer). (2010). Massage hand [digital image]. Retrieved from Wikimedia Commons website: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Massage#/media/File:Massage-hand-4.jpg

Oskin, G. (Photographer). (2009). Rebecca Onie health services innovator [digital image]. Retrieved from Wikimedia Commons website: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:REBECCA_ONIE_12.JPG
Pelletier, M. (Photographer). (2016). Pill bottle spilled [digital image]. Retrieved from Wikimedia Commons website:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pill_Bottle_Spilled.jpg



More Than a Buzz…


Adonica I. Kauwe
PhD Student
College of Nursing
University of Utah


In recent literature, terms such as transdisciplinarity and translational research have become popular – “buzz words”. Because healthcare is rapidly changing, the increasing demands for specialization of healthcare professionals and challenges for collaboration between specialists causes an emerging dilemma (Hall & Weaver, 2001). Perhaps these terms are more than just “buzz words” and may, in fact, provide critical strategies for new nursing theories and models addressing complex and often chronic conditions, such as noncommunicable diseases and associated complications.

Because nursing is a human science with holistic assessments and interventions, the nurse’s role is in itself complex and dynamic. Role confusion for nurses may be an unintended outcome of utilizing transdisciplinary and translational research models. However, because of the holistic and comprehensive knowledge and skills of nurses, the possibilities associated with utilizing such models are limitless. The following is meant to serve as one example of utilizing transdisciplinary and translational methods:
  • Health Issue – chronic wounds
  • Various disciplines working together – transdisciplinary teamwork/transdisciplinarity
  • Transforming scientific findings into application – translational nursing

Lens: Wounds and Chronic Wounds
Wounds and infections are an underappreciated but serious complication for a diverse spectrum of diseases, especially for high-risk groups, such as persons with diabetes (Kalan et al., 2016). In the U.S. in 2000, approximately 40 million inpatient surgical procedures and 31.5 million outpatient surgeries were performed.  Increasing health care costs, an aging population, and sharp rise in the incidence of diabetes and obesity worldwide is a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy (Sen, et al., 2009). Chronic wounds are unable to heal due to cellular and molecular abnormalities within the wound bed, prohibiting the timely and orderly repairing process (Broderick, 2009).

Lens: Economic Impact
             In the U.S. alone, it is estimated that chronic wounds affect approximately 6.5 million patients and more than $25 billion is spent annually on treatments (Sen, et al., 2009). Because of multiple variables, monetary global economic impact is difficult to quantify. However, of the 57 million global deaths in 2008, 36 million were due to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and nearly 80 percent of these deaths – 29 million – occurred in low- and middle-income countries (WHO, 2008). The challenges of NCDs (cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, etc.) and associated complications such as wounds are particularly acute in the Pacific Islands, which have some of the highest rates of diabetes and obesity in the world. In 2011, at the 42nd Pacific Islands Forum Communique, Pacific leaders expressed their deep concern “that an estimated 75 percent of all adult deaths in the Pacific were due to NCDs, with the majority of the deaths occurring in adults in the economically active age bracket.” Pacific leaders also declared NCDs have become a “human, social, and economic crisis” (Anderson, 2014).

Lens: Government
             The World Health Organization’s Non-communicable Diseases Country Profile for Samoa (2011) indicates that 70 percent of the total mortality rate is directly associated with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). According to Dr. Tuitama Leao Talalelei Tuitama, the Samoan Minister of Health, the number one cause of mortality in Samoa is directly related to NCDs, specifically chronic wounds, infection, and sepsis, usually subsequent to type 2 diabetes. As antimicrobial resistance increases, infections and chronic wounds are steadily becoming of paramount concern, especially for Samoa because of limited access to preventative and effective treatments. Furthermore, chronic wounds, infection, and sepsis involve longer lengths of stays in clinics and hospitals for patients as well as advanced treatments amplifying the associated burdens in an already resource-limited country.

Lens: Bio-organic Chemistry and Microbiology
          Recent scientific studies have identified the presence of surface-associated bacterial communities called biofilms (complex microbial communities) in chronic wounds (Bozkurt-Guzel, Savage, and Gerceker, 2011).  Bacteria living in these biofilm communities are protected from natural immunity and are up to 5,000 times more resistant to antibiotics than planktonic (free-floating) bacteria (Ding et al., 2004). Expanded microbiome research in chronic wounds indicates fungal communities (the mycobiome) form mixed fungal-bacterial biofilms further delaying wound healing, causing further complications such as amputations, and impeding clinical outcomes (Kalan et al., 2016; Hurlow, 2015).

Ceragenins were developed as mimics of endogenous antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). To fully understand the potential applications of ceragenins requires an understanding of the roles that endogenous AMPs play in higher organisms. AMPs play a key role in innate immunity, have antimicrobial activity, sequester fungal-bacterial biofilms, and inhibit local inflammatory responses. Additionally, AMPs trigger processes essential for wound healing, and multiple AMPs have been characterized as accelerators of wound healing. However, AMPs are subject to proteolytic degradation and are cost prohibitive to manufacture in large scales (Savage, 2015-17).  
Chemical structure of CSA-8. Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CSA-8.png

Ceragenins effectively mimic the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and wound healing properties of AMPs (Lai et al., 2009; Mangoni, Mcdermott, & Zasloff, 2016; Bucki, Sostarecz, Byfield, Savage, & Janmey, 2007).  Ceragenins are broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents; they are highly active against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, generally at concentrations far below those required for comparable activity with AMPs (Lai et al., 2009; Durnaś et al., 2016; Vila-Farréset al., 2015; Wnorowska et al., 2015; Leszczynska et al., 2014; Bozkurt-Guzel, Savage, & Gerceker, 2011). Ceragenins are actively bactericidal and kill bacteria within established biofilms (Nagant et al., 2013; Pollard et al., 2009). Ceragenins retain activity against drug-resistant bacteria, including colistin-resistant Gram-negative organisms Vila-Farréset al., 2015; Saha, Savage, & Bal, 2008; Chin, Jones, Sader, Savage, & Rybak, 2007; Chin, Rybak, Cheung, & Savage, 2007). Ceragenins are potent antifungal agents and display activity against lipid-enveloped viruses (Durnaś et al., 2016; Howell et al., 2009). Ceragenins sequester bacterial endotoxins, inhibiting release of inflammatory cytokines (Bucki et al., 2007). Ceragenins promote wound healing by mimicking the effects of human AMP LL-37 triggering neovascularization and bone regrowth (Schindeler et al., 2015). Because ceragenins effectively reproduce the antibacterial, anti-fungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and wound healing properties of AMPs, without the constraints of proteolytic degradation, engenderment of resistance, or high manufacturing costs, they provide an attractive alternative for use of AMPs in wound care, infection, etc. 

Lens: Nursing

Optimal management of chronic wounds and wound infections is essential not only to promote a good healing response, but also because of the significant morbidity and mortality associated with wound infections (Edwards & Harding, 2004 Often the first-point of patient contact, nurses play a vital role in efforts to support wound healing. The presence of biofilms is now well accepted in wound science as an important risk factor for wound chronicity, including infections and prolonged inflammation. Though barriers exist, such as deficient understanding of exactly how biofilms impair healing, lack of technologies needed for clinical diagnosing of biofilms, and cost-effective treatments, the nursing profession, collectively, offers unique and dynamic perspectives (Hurlow, 2016). 

Transdisciplinarity and Translational Science

            Transdisciplinarity has been defined as “holistic schemes that subordinate disciplines, looking at the dynamics of whole systems” and is more than drawing on independent disciplines. Rather transdisciplinarity requires a common perspective that “transcends” those standards in independent disciplines (Choi & Pak, 2006). Because wounds, chronic wounds and infections are often associated with co-morbid conditions such as obesity and diabetes, the complexities to effectively address these challenges in the clinical setting are multifaceted. Wounds and infections continue to be a major and snowballing threat to public health and economies (WHO, 2011 & NIH, 2010).

Effective treatments and defining characteristics for biofilm infections within chronic wounds have yet to be resolved. A comprehensive approach that is effective, efficient, equitable, affordable, and sustainable in addressing NCDs and subsequent chronic wounds, infection, and sepsis is critical. Transdisciplinarity and translational science are more than a buzz; they are inevitable strategies necessary in creating effective methods and models for improving wound healing and overall health!   

References
Anderson, I. (2014, April 07). The economic costs of non-communicable diseases in the Pacific
Bozkurt-Guzel, C., Savage, P. B., & Gerceker, A. A. (2011). In vitro Activities of the Novel
Ceragenin CSA-13, Alone or in Combination with Colistin, Tobramycin, and
Ciprofloxacin, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Cystic Fibrosis
Patients. Chemotherapy,57(6), 505-510. doi:10.1159/000335588
Broderick, N. (2009). Understanding chronic wound healing. The Nurse Practitioner,34(10), 16-
22. doi:10.1097/01.NPR.0000361299.88402.f6
Bucki, R., Sostarecz, A. G., Byfield, F. J., Savage, P. B., & Janmey, P. A. (2007). Resistance of
the antibacterial agent ceragenin CSA-13 to inactivation by DNA or F-actin and its
activity in cystic fibrosis sputum. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy,60(3), 535-
545. doi:10.1093/jac/dkm218
Chin, J. N., Jones, R. N., Sader, H. S., Savage, P. B., & Rybak, M. J. (2007). Potential synergy
activity of the novel ceragenin, CSA-13, against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy,61(2), 365-370. doi:10.1093/jac/dkm457
Chin, J. N., Rybak, M. J., Cheung, C. M., & Savage, P. B. (2007). Antimicrobial Activities of
Ceragenins against Clinical Isolates of Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,51(4), 1268-1273. doi:10.1128/aac.01325-06
Choi, B. K., & Pak, A. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in
health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical And Investigative Medicine. Medecine Clinique Et Experimentale29(6), 351-364.
Deaths from NCDs. (2008). Retrieved June 01, 2017, from
Ding, B., Yin, N., Liu, Y., Cardenas-Garcia, J., Evanson, R., Orsak, T., . . . Savage, P. B. (2004).
Origins of Cell Selectivity of Cationic Steroid Antibiotics. Journal of the American
Chemical Society,126(42), 13642-13648. doi:10.1021/ja046909p
Durnaś, B., Wnorowska, U., Pogoda, K., Deptuła, P., Wątek, M., Piktel, E., . . . Bucki, R. (2016).
Candidacidal Activity of Selected Ceragenins and Human Cathelicidin LL-37 in
Experimental Settings Mimicking Infection Sites. Plos One,11(6).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157242
Dyer, J. (2003). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary educational models
and nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League For Nursing)24(4), 186-188.
Enhancing nursing and midwifery capacity to contribute to the prevention, treatment and
management of noncommunicable diseases. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2017, from http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/observer12/en/
Hall, P., & Weaver, L. (2001). Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding
road. Medical Education35(9), 867-875.
Howell, M. D., Streib, J. E., Kim, B. E., Lesley, L. J., Dunlap, A. P., Geng, D., . . . Leung, D. Y.
(2009). Ceragenins: A Class of Antiviral Compounds to Treat Orthopox Infections. Journal of Investigative Dermatology,129(11), 2668-2675. doi:10.1038/jid.2009.120
Hurlow, J. (2015). Biofilm as the cause of non-healing wounds. MedSurg Nursing,24(2), 12th
ser. Retrieved February 3, 2016.
Kalan L, Loesche M, Hodkinson BP, Heilmann K, Ruthel G, Gardner SE, Grice EA. 2016.
Redefining the chronic-wound microbiome: fungal communities are prevalent, dynamic, and associated with delayed healing. mBio 7(5):e01058-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.01058-16.
Krasner, D. L., & Sibbald, R. G. (1999). Nursing management of chronic wounds: best practices
across the continuum of care. The Nursing clinics of North America, 34(4), 933-53.
Lai, X., Feng, Y., Pollard, J., Chin, J. N., Rybak, M. J., Bucki, R., . . . Savage, P. B. (2008).
Ceragenins: Cholic Acid-Based Mimics of Antimicrobial Peptides. Accounts of Chemical
Research,41(10), 1233-1240. doi:10.1021/ar700270t
Leszczynska, K., Namiot, D., Byfield, F. J., Cruz, K., Zendzian-Piotrowska, M., Fein, D. E., . . .
Bucki, R. (2012). Antibacterial activity of the human host defence peptide LL-37 and
selected synthetic cationic lipids against bacteria associated with oral and upper respiratory tract infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy,68(3), 610-618. doi:10.1093/jac/dks434
Mangoni, M. L., Mcdermott, A. M., & Zasloff, M. (2016). Antimicrobial peptides and wound
healing: biological and therapeutic considerations. Experimental Dermatology,25(3), 167-173. doi:10.1111/exd.12929
Nagant, C., Pitts, B., Stewart, P. S., Feng, Y., Savage, P. B., & Dehaye, J. (2013). Study of the
effect of antimicrobial peptide mimic, CSA-13, on an established biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MicrobiologyOpen,2(2), 318-325. doi:10.1002/mbo3.77
Pollard, J., Wright, J., Feng, Y., Geng, D., Genberg, C., & Savage, P. (2009). Activities of
Ceragenin CSA-13 Against Established Biofilms in an In Vitro Model of Catheter Decolonization. Anti-Infective Agents in Medicinal Chemistry,8(4), 290-294. doi:10.2174/187152109789760225
Saha, S., Savage, P., & Bal, M. (2008). Enhancement of the efficacy of erythromycin in multiple
antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Journal of Applied Microbiology,105(3), 822-828. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03820.x
Savage, P. B. (2015 – 2017). Health Indications with Ceragenins [Personal interview]. 
Schindeler, A., Yu, N. Y., Cheng, T. L., Sullivan, K., Mikulec, K., Peacock, L., . . . Little, D. G.
(2015). Local Delivery of the Cationic Steroid Antibiotic CSA-90 Enables Osseous Union in a Rat Open Fracture Model of Staphylococcus aureus Infection. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,97(4), 302-309. doi:10.2106/jbjs.n.00840
Sen, C. K., Gordillo, G. M., Roy, S., Kirsner, R., Lambert, L., Hunt, T. K., & ... Longaker, M. T.
(2009). Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair And Regeneration: Official Publication Of The Wound Healing Society [And] The European Tissue Repair Society17(6), 763-771. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x
Stepans, M. B., Thompson, C. L., & Buchanan, M. L. (2002). The Role of the Nurse on a
Transdisciplinary Early Intervention Assessment Team. Public Health Nursing,19(4), 238-245. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1446.2002.19403.x
Tuitama, D. L. (2016, May 5). NCDs in Samoa [Personal interview].
Vila-Farrés, X., Callarisa, A. E., Gu, X., Savage, P. B., Giralt, E., & Vila, J. (2015). CSA-131, a
ceragenin active against colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa clinical isolates. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents,46(5), 568-571. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.08.003
Wnorowska, U., Niemirowicz, K., Myint, M., Diamond, S. L., Wróblewska, M., Savage, P.
B., . . . Bucki, R. (2015). Bactericidal Activities of Cathelicidin LL-37 and Select Cationic Lipids against the Hypervirulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain LESB58. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,59(7), 3808-3815. doi:10.1128/aac.00421-15